allow it to be standing proof that you never want to attempt to draw shitty conclusions where I can see them.
Magyk wrote:This guy thinks he's cool by always being 100% literal. Conversation fail, as always.
This has negligible relevance to taking something "literally."
My point was that you're using faulty logic to twist someone's words to construe something totally different.
It pains me that I must explain this to you, but it appears that I have to in order for you to fully understand your folly.
I don't think Steve Carell is funny. From this, you deduced that since Steve Carell stars primarily in comedies, that I must not enjoy any comedy actor/film or whatever.
This is a prime example of the
use of a
hasty generalization, which is essentially a misuse of inductive reasoning. You took one detail and applied it to a more global statement, and somehow assumed it'd be true as well. In hindsight:
This has negligible relevance to taking something "literally."
And so this is why you shouldn't try to draw conclusions about myself, or anyone. Because you don't seem to think them through very well. And just because no one cares enough to point it out, doesn't change the fact that you just make yourself look like an idiot.
ps: I do like funny things. Example? Watching you attempt to yews logic
